Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 73(7): 410-418, 2023 Oct 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713597

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While extensive research has highlighted increased risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in firefighters, previous research has yielded mixed results regarding the role of work status (professional versus volunteer) in the development of psychopathological symptoms. AIMS: To explore the predictive strength of work status on PTSD or post-traumatic stress symptom severity in a large sample of professional (PFFs) and volunteer (VFFs) Australian firefighters exposed to operational work-related trauma. METHODS: The stratified random sample comprised 1317 PFFs (n = 1148 (87%) males and 13%, n = 169 (13%) females) and 898 VFFs (n = 744 (83%) males and n = 154 (17%) females) who reported having experienced trauma while working or volunteering. Participants completed demographic, health and work-related questions and mental health measures of stress, trauma, PTSD, social support and use of mental health prevention programmes. RESULTS: The results revealed a significant relationship between work status and PTSD, with PFFs reporting higher levels of PTSD symptom severity compared to VFFs. This association persisted after controlling for demographics, health, stress away from work, social support and use of organizational mental health support programmes (debriefing and face-to-face training for mental and physical self-care). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the importance of work status in PTSD amongst Australian firefighters exposed to operational trauma. Future research is needed to substantiate our findings and examine why PFFs may be more prone to developing PTSD. Implications for the provision of mental health programmes offered by fire organizations to their members are discussed.

2.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 73(5): 249-256, 2023 06 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37261470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Common mental disorders (CMDs) and suicidal ideation (SI) are prevalent among doctors, yet limited evidence exists investigating the relationship of specialty area to these outcomes. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of likely CMD and SI among doctors and to investigate whether likelihood of these outcomes varied by area of medical specialty. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a representative national survey of 12,252 Australian doctors was conducted. Demographic and work-related variables, SI and CMD (GHQ-28), were assessed among doctors (n = 7037; 57%) working in a range of specialty areas. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between specialty and mental health outcomes in unadjusted and adjusted models. RESULTS: Almost one-quarter of doctors (n = 1560; 23%) reported symptom levels indicating likely CMD whilst 9% (n = 667) reported SI in the last year. Doctors in surgery (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.97, P = 0.03) were at significantly lower risk of CMD than General Practitioners (GPs), whilst doctors in anaesthetics (adjusted OR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.09-1.93, P = 0.01) and paediatrics (adjusted OR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.02-3.47, P = 0.04) were at significantly higher risk of experiencing SI compared to GPs after accounting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated that doctors in Australia working in certain specialties, specifically anaesthetics and paediatrics, were at significantly greater risk of suicidal ideation compared to GPs after accounting for confounders. Interventions to address CMD and SI among doctors in all specialties remain urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Medicina , Trastornos Mentales , Suicidio , Humanos , Niño , Ideación Suicida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Australia/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología
3.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 72(1): 17-24, 2022 01 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34693972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression account for considerable cost to organizations, driven by both presenteeism (reduced performance due to attending work while ill) and absenteeism. Most research has focused on the impact of depression, with less attention given to anxiety and comorbid presentations. AIMS: To explore the cross-sectional relationship between depression and anxiety (individually and comorbidly) on workplace performance and sickness absence. METHODS: As part of a larger study to evaluate a mental health app, 4953 working Australians were recruited. Participants completed in-app assessment including demographic questions, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder and questions from the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire. Cut-off scores were used to establish probable cases of depression alone, anxiety alone and comorbidity. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 7% met cut-off for depression only, 13% anxiety only, while 16% were comorbid. Those with comorbidity reported greater symptom severity, poorer work performance and more sickness absence compared to all other groups. Presenteeism and absenteeism were significantly worse in those with depression only and anxiety only compared to those with non-clinical symptom levels. Although those with depression alone tended to have poorer outcomes than the anxiety-only group, when sample prevalence rates were considered, the impact on presenteeism was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace functioning is heavily impacted by depression and anxiety both independently and where they co-occur. While comorbidity and more severe depression presentations stand out as impairing, workplace interventions should also prioritize targeting of anxiety disorders (and associated presenteeism) given their high population prevalence.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Depresión , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología
4.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 70(3): 162-168, 2020 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32040153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pre-employment psychological screening to detect psychological vulnerability is common amongst emergency service organizations worldwide, yet the evidence for its ability to predict poor mental health outcomes is limited with published studies looking at post-recruitment research data rather than data collected by the organizations themselves. AIMS: The present study sought to investigate the ability of pre-employment screening to predict later psychological injury-related absenteeism amongst police officers. METHODS: A nested case-control study using prospective data was conducted. One hundred and fifty police officers with a liability-accepted psychological injury were matched to a control group of 150 psychologically healthy officers. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine associations between Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) scales measuring factors research has shown to predict psychological injury (Neuroticism, Psychoticism, Introversion, Disconstraint and Aggressiveness) and psychopathology (Depression, Anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) with subsequent psychological injury. RESULTS: Contrary to expectations, we were unable to demonstrate any association between validated pre-employment measures of personality and psychopathology with mental health outcomes amongst newly recruited police officers over a 7-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Other measures may be better able to predict future mental health problems in police recruits.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Policia/psicología , Australia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Empleo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , MMPI , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Determinación de la Personalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 141(3): 206-220, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31733146

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Individual placement and support (IPS) has shown consistently better outcomes on competitive employment for patients with severe mental illness than traditional vocational rehabilitation. The evidence for efficacy originates from few countries, and generalization to different countries has been questioned. This has delayed implementation of IPS and led to requests for country-specific RCTs. This meta-analysis examines if evidence for IPS efficacy can be generalized between rather different countries. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify RCTs. Overall efficacy was established by meta-analysis. The generalizability of IPS efficacy between countries was analysed by random-effects meta-regression, employing country- and date-specific contextual data obtained from the OECD and the World Bank. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 27 RCTs. Employment rates are more than doubled in IPS compared with standard vocational rehabilitation (RR 2.07 95% CI 1.82-2.35). The efficacy of IPS was marginally moderated by strong legal protection against dismissals. It was not moderated by regulation of temporary employment, generosity of disability benefits, type of integration policies, GDP, unemployment rate or employment rate for those with low education. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for efficacy of IPS is very strong. The efficacy of IPS can be generalized between countries.


Asunto(s)
Empleos Subvencionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Empleo/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Asia , Australia , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , América del Norte , Políticas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
6.
J Affect Disord ; 256: 536-540, 2019 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31280078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are common within the working population. Depression is both highly prevalent and debilitating and is linked to increases in absenteeism and presenteeism. The use of summed depression scale scores may conceal differential impacts of depressive symptoms on absenteeism and presenteeism. We aimed to explore both the relationship between absenteeism and presenteeism and both depression severity, along with the independent contributions of different symptoms. METHODS: Participants (N = 4953) were employees recruited as part of a larger study to evaluate a mental health smartphone app and were recruited via industry partner organisations and social media. Participants completed in-app assessment which included demographic information, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression tool, and items of the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire. The relationship between depressive symptoms, absenteeism and presenteeism was estimated using both total summed scores and individual symptoms of depression. RESULTS: Univariate linear regression confirmed a negative linear relationship between depression severity and presenteeism, which remained significant after controlling for age, gender, industry, and work position. Similarly, there was a statistically significant relationship between depression severity and the amount of mental health related sickness absence taken over the preceding 28 days. Johnson's relative weights analysis showed contributory differences amongst depression symptoms in relation to presenteeism and absenteeism. DISCUSSION: Significant relationships between depression severity and both absenteeism and presenteeism were present indicating increases in absence and decreases in performance with increasing severity. There existed differences amongst the contribution of specific symptoms of depression to both outcomes of interest. The symptoms that contribute most to absence were more behavioural in nature, whilst those contributing most to presenteeism were more cognitive. These findings have practical implications for clinicians and employers in making treatment and return-to-work decisions.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Depresión/psicología , Presentismo , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rendimiento Laboral
7.
BMC Psychiatry ; 19(1): 146, 2019 05 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31088405

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Construction workers are at elevated risk of suicide. MATES in Construction (MATES) is one of the few suicide prevention programs that explicitly address this problem. The MATES program includes an integrated system of services that supports prevention, early intervention and recovery (i.e., primary, secondary and tertiary prevention) for mental health problems among construction workers. In this protocol, we describe a proposed evaluation of MATESmobile, an electronic platform which will be accessed by workers who have undergone MATES training. METHODS/DESIGN: In this protocol, we describe a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) which seeks to assess whether MATESmobile results in improved literacy regarding suicide prevention, and improved help-seeking and help-offering attitudes among those who have attended MATES training. Secondary outcomes include changes in suicide ideation, suicide attempt and psychological distress. Workers will be recruited prior to MATES face-to-face training. In total, 295 workers will be randomly assigned to the intervention condition (MATESmobile + face-to-face training) and 295 will be randomly allocated to the control (face-to-face training). The intervention will run for 8 weeks. Assessments will be run immediately post intervention, and at 3, 6, and 12 months DISCUSSION: MATESmobile offers the potential to reinforce and enhance the effects of face-to-face training, resulting in greater skills and knowledge in suicide prevention, as well as a reduction in suicidality and distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12619000625178 ; 26 April 2019).


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción , Teléfono Inteligente , Ideación Suicida , Prevención del Suicidio , Suicidio/psicología , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
8.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 68(7): 464-468, 2018 Sep 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30060150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many organizations are implementing mental health training for managers to facilitate better communication between managers and employees suffering from mental health problems. Much of this training focuses on improving managers' mental health literacy and reducing stigma. However, it is unclear whether this focus is appropriate or whether other targets, such as improving skills and confidence, should be given greater consideration. AIMS: To test whether knowledge, attitudes and confidence are associated with managers' behavioural responses to mental health issues among their staff. METHODS: Managers from a large Australian fire and rescue service completed a questionnaire addressing their knowledge, attitudes, confidence and behavioural responses when managing employee mental health issues. The relationship was assessed using logistic regression. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty-five managers responded (response rate 66%). Managers' confidence was the strongest predictor of their behaviour. Managers who felt confident discussing mental health were significantly more likely to make contact with an employee who was suspected to be suffering from a mental illness (OR 15.79, 95% CI 3.03-82.37, P < 0.01) or was on sickness leave for mental health reasons (OR 19.84, 95% CI 2.25-175.15, P < 0.01). Non-stigmatizing attitudes towards mental illness also significantly predicted contact with a staff member off work due to mental health problems (OR 5.22, 95% CI 1.21-22.54, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that manager mental health training should focus on building their confidence and reducing stigma in order to have the greatest chance of altering workplace practices.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Organización y Administración , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Australia , Bomberos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Administración de Personal/métodos , Trabajo de Rescate/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo/normas
9.
BMC Psychiatry ; 18(1): 166, 2018 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29859060

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is a commonly occurring disorder linked to diminished role functioning and quality of life. The development of treatments that overcome barriers to accessing treatment remains an important area of clinical research as most people delay or do not receive treatment at an appropriate time. The workplace is an ideal setting to roll-out an intervention, particularly given the substantial psychological benefits associated with remaining in the workforce. Mobile health (mhealth) interventions utilising smartphone applications (apps) offer novel solutions to disseminating evidence based programs, however few apps have undergone rigorous testing. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a smartphone app designed to treat depressive symptoms in workers. METHODS: The present study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT), comparing the effectiveness of the intervention to that of an attention control. The primary outcome measured will be reduced depressive symptoms at 3 months. Secondary outcomes such as wellbeing and work performance will also be measured. Employees from a range of industries will be recruited via a mixture of targeted social media advertising and Industry partners. Participants will be included if they present with likely current depression at baseline. Following baseline assessment (administered within the app), participants will be randomised to receive one of two versions of the Headgear application: 1) Intervention (a 30-day mental health intervention focusing on behavioural activation and mindfulness), or 2) attention control app (mood monitoring for 30 days). Participants will be blinded to their allocation. Analyses will be conducted within an intention to treat framework using mixed modelling. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide valuable information about the effectiveness of mhealth interventions in the treatment of depressive symptoms in a workplace context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The current trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12617000547347 , Registration date: 19/04/2017).


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/instrumentación , Depresión/terapia , Teléfono Inteligente/instrumentación , Adulto , Depresión/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Aplicaciones Móviles , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Telemedicina , Terapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 67(8): 644-647, 2017 Dec 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29016957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) report sickness absence certification as challenging. They express need for support with functional assessment beyond guidelines and reforms. Case-specific collegial one-to-one guidance for other clinical topics has proved popular with GPs and may be an acceptable and effective way to improve GPs skills and competence in sickness absence certification. AIMS: To present a new model of case-specific colleague guidance focusing on the management of long-term sickness absence and to describe its feasibility in terms of application and reception among GPs, and also GPs' self-reports of effects on their practice. METHODS: Randomly selected GPs received case-specific collegial guidance over a 12-month period, in two Norwegian trials, delivered by former GPs employed by the social security administration. We measured reception and perceived effects by GPs' self-report and registered participation and withdrawal rates. RESULTS: The participation rate (n = 165) was 94%, and no GPs withdrew during training. Among the 116 GPs responding to the survey (70%), 112 (97%; 95% CI 92-99) stated they would recommend it to their colleagues. Considerable benefit from the guidance was reported by 68 (59%; 95% CI 50-68). The GPs self-reported other effects on their sickness absence certification, specifically an increased use of part-time sickness absence (Fit-Note equivalent). CONCLUSIONS: This model of case-specific colleague guidance to aid GPs' management of long-term sickness absence is feasible and was popular. This type of guidance was perceived by GPs to be somewhat beneficial and to alter their sickness absence certification behaviour, though the true impact requires further testing in controlled trials.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Política Organizacional , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 310, 2017 08 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28851342

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are associated with a range of adverse outcomes and represent a large global burden to individuals and health care systems. Prevention programs are an important way to avert a proportion of the burden associated with such conditions both at a clinical and subclinical level. eHealth interventions provide an opportunity to offer accessible, acceptable, easily disseminated globally low-cost interventions on a wide scale. However, the efficacy of these programs remains unclear. The aim of this study is to review and evaluate the effects of eHealth prevention interventions for anxiety and depression. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted on four relevant databases to identify randomized controlled trials of eHealth interventions aimed at the prevention of anxiety and depression in the general population published between 2000 and January 2016. The quality of studies was assessed and a meta-analysis was performed using pooled effect size estimates obtained from a random effects model. RESULTS: Ten trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies were of sufficient quality and utilized cognitive behavioural techniques. At post-treatment, the overall mean difference between the intervention and control groups was 0.25 (95% confidence internal: 0.09, 0.41; p = 0.003) for depression outcome studies and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.52; p = 0.004) for anxiety outcome studies, indicating a small but positive effect of the eHealth interventions. The effect sizes for universal and indicated/selective interventions were similar (0.29 and 0.25 respectively). However, there was inadequate evidence to suggest that such interventions have an effect on long-term disorder incidence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that eHealth prevention interventions for anxiety and depression are associated with small but positive effects on symptom reduction. However, there is inadequate evidence on the medium to long-term effect of such interventions, and importantly, on the reduction of incidence of disorders. Further work to explore the impact of eHealth psychological interventions on long-term incidence rates.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud , Telemedicina , Trastornos de Ansiedad/prevención & control , Humanos
12.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 67(6): 425-428, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28535246

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency service workers are often exposed to trauma and have increased risk of a range of mental health (MH) conditions. Smartphone applications have the potential to provide this group with effective psychological interventions; however, little is known about the acceptability and preferences regarding such initiatives. AIMS: To describe the preferences and opinions of emergency service workers regarding the use of smartphone MH applications and to examine the impact of age on these preferences. METHODS: Participants were recruited from four metropolitan Fire and Rescue NSW stations and responded to questionnaire items covering three key domains: current smartphone use, potential future use and preferences for design and content as well as therapeutic techniques. RESULTS: Overall, approximately half the sample (n = 106) claimed they would be interested in trying a tailored emergency-worker MH smartphone application. There were few differences between age groups on preferences. The majority of respondents claimed they would use an app for mental well-being daily and preferred terms such as 'well-being' and 'mental fitness' for referring to MH. Confidentiality, along with a focus on stress, sleep, exercise and resiliency were all considered key features. Behavioural therapeutic techniques were regarded most favourably, compared with other therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency workers were interested in utilizing smartphone applications focused on MH, but expressed clear preferences regarding language used in promotion, features required and therapeutic techniques preferred.


Asunto(s)
Bomberos/psicología , Salud Mental , Aplicaciones Móviles , Teléfono Inteligente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Estrés Laboral , Resiliencia Psicológica , Sueño , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Psychol Med ; 46(4): 683-97, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26620157

RESUMEN

Depression and anxiety disorders are the leading cause of sickness absence and long-term work incapacity in most developed countries. The present study aimed to carry out a systematic meta-review examining the effectiveness of workplace mental health interventions, defined as any intervention that a workplace may either initiate or facilitate that aims to prevent, treat or rehabilitate a worker with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or both. Relevant reviews were identified via a detailed systematic search of academic and grey literature databases. All articles were subjected to a rigorous quality appraisal using the AMSTAR assessment. Of the 5179 articles identified, 140 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 20 were deemed to be of moderate or high quality. Together, these reviews analysed 481 primary research studies. Moderate evidence was identified for two primary prevention interventions; enhancing employee control and promoting physical activity. Stronger evidence was found for CBT-based stress management although less evidence was found for other secondary prevention interventions, such as counselling. Strong evidence was also found against the routine use of debriefing following trauma. Tertiary interventions with a specific focus on work, such as exposure therapy and CBT-based and problem-focused return-to-work programmes, had a strong evidence base for improving symptomology and a moderate evidence base for improving occupational outcomes. Overall, these findings demonstrate there are empirically supported interventions that workplaces can utilize to aid in the prevention of common mental illness as well as facilitating the recovery of employees diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/prevención & control , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud Mental , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador , Prevención Primaria , Prevención Secundaria , Estrés Psicológico/rehabilitación , Trastornos de Ansiedad/rehabilitación , Trastorno Depresivo/rehabilitación , Ejercicio Físico , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Lugar de Trabajo
14.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 63(7): 507-9, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23990507

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Common mental disorders are the leading cause of sickness absence but are frequently misdiagnosed and undertreated. It is against this background that a specialist occupational psychiatry clinic was established at a London teaching hospital. AIMS: To explore the nature of patients and complaints seen in the clinic and investigate whether this form of service provision reached patients who may have otherwise been missed in the gap between primary and secondary care. METHODS: We reviewed the case notes of 51 consecutive new clinic assessments using a data extraction form, gathering information on socio-demographic and occupational details; the nature, duration and severity of symptoms [as assessed by Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS)]; diagnosis; prior treatment and the outcome of the clinic appointment. RESULTS: Only half of those seen in the new clinic were currently on sick leave. The most common diagnosis was depression with most having symptoms lasting longer than 9 months. Sixty-five per cent had a medium or high HoNOS rating. Although 75% had received treatment from their general practitioner, the majority remained functionally impaired, and only 31% had been seen in secondary care. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist occupational psychiatry clinics do not replicate the work already being done by standard mental health services. Patients referred to a new specialist clinic within an occupational health department had chronic, debilitating psychiatric illnesses, which in many cases had failed to respond adequately to primary care treatment and were at risk of falling into the gap between primary and secondary services.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador , Psiquiatría , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Londres/epidemiología , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Secundaria de Salud , Adulto Joven
15.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 63(3): 217-23, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23447034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Occupational health (OH) practitioners need to be confident in identifying and managing mental health problems in the workforce. AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of a one-day workshop in improving the knowledge, attitude and confidence of OH practitioners in detecting and managing depression, anxiety, suicide risk, alcohol misuse and drug abuse. METHODS: Interactive mental health workshops for 164 OH practitioners held in five regions in England were evaluated by self-administered questionnaire. Data were collected immediately prior to the workshop (T1), immediately after the workshop (T2) and 4 months following the workshop (T3). RESULTS: At T1, the response rate was 97% (159/164), 90% at T2 and 63% at T3. The mean improvement in participants' knowledge was 8% (95% CI 6-10) at T2 compared with T1. The biggest improvement was in participants with no previous training in the management of common mental health problems in the workplace, mean improvement 9% (95% CI 6-12). Participants' confidence improved in all areas assessed at T2, and the improvement in confidence compared with that at baseline was sustained at 4 months (T3). Participants reported using the knowledge gained in clinical practice in all topic areas covered. Use of knowledge gained at the workshop was significantly higher in those who had had previous training in managing common mental health disorders. CONCLUSIONS: This one-day interactive workshop was a feasible and effective method of improving OH professionals' confidence, knowledge and application of skills in practice in key areas of mental health.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Salud Mental/educación , Medicina del Trabajo/educación , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos Laborales/psicología , Médicos Laborales/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoeficacia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
16.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 127(4): 287-97, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22775341

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine and compare the prospective effect of the common mental disorders (CMD) anxiety and depression on duration and recurrence of sickness absence (SA), and to investigate whether the effect of CMD on SA is detectable over time. METHOD: Information from a large epidemiological health study (N = 13 436) was linked with official records of SA episodes lasting ≥16 days up to 6 years after participation. Common mental disorders were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Associations were analysed with Cox regression and multinomial logistic regression models controlling for potential covariates. RESULTS: Comorbid anxiety and depression, and anxiety only were significant risk factors for SA after adjusting for covariates, whilst depression only was not. Anxiety and depression were stronger predictors for longer duration of SA episodes compared with shorter duration and associated with more frequent recurrence of SA. There was a general trend toward the effect of CMD on SA becoming weaker over time; however, the effect of anxiety only on SA remained stable throughout the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Common mental disorders are long-lasting predictors of onset, duration and recurrence of SA. Anxiety appears to be a more important contributor to long-term SA than previously described in the literature.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Psychol Med ; 42(12): 2631-40, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22565011

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Common mental disorders (CMDs) are associated with occupational impairment and the receipt of disability benefits (DBs). Little is known about the relationship between personality disorders (PDs) and work disability, and whether the association between CMDs and work disability is affected by the presence of co-morbid PDs. The aim of this study was to examine the association between DB and individual categories of PDs, with special attention to the effect of co-morbid CMDs on this association. METHOD: The association between DB and PD was examined using data from the 2000 British National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity. Probable PD caseness was identified using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II) screening questionnaire. The impact of CMDs, assessed with the revised version of the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R), was examined as a covariate and in a stratified analysis of co-morbidity. Other covariates included sociodemographic factors, long-standing illnesses and substance use. RESULTS: Probable PD was associated with DB, with the strongest associations found for borderline, dependent and schizotypal PD. Antisocial PD was not associated with DB. The relationship between PD and DB was strongly modified by CMD, reducing the association from an odds ratio (OR) of 2.84 to 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.79)]. In the stratified analysis, co-morbid PD and CMD showed a stronger association with DB than PD without CMD but, when fully adjusted, this effect was not significantly different from the association between CMD without PD. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals screening positive for PD are more likely to experience severe occupational outcomes, especially in the presence of co-morbid CMD.


Asunto(s)
Seguro por Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Personalidad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos de la Personalidad/rehabilitación , Rehabilitación Vocacional , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Reino Unido , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos , Adulto Joven
18.
Eur J Pain ; 16(4): 611-20, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22396089

RESUMEN

Widespread pain (WSP) is common in the general population and is associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study was to quantify the risk for medically certified disability pension from WSP. We further studied how other common physical symptoms, common mental disorders and functional limitations influenced this risk. A prospective cohort design was established by linking the large population based Hordaland Health Study (n > 18000 individuals aged 40-46) with an administrative registry on disability pension awards. We modelled hazard ratios for later all-cause and diagnosis specific disability pensioning from WSP, adjusted for potential confounders and examined the impact of other co-occurring health problems and functional limitations. WSP was common (12.4%) and associated with a range of mental health, and non-specific and non-musculoskeletal symptoms. As expected, WSP was a strong predictor for disability pension award. Hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for socio-economic status, health behaviours and comorbid medical diagnoses indicated WSP was strongest in predicting pensioning for musculoskeletal diagnoses (HR = 5.91, 95% CI 4.64-7.54), but also predicted pensioning for mental disorder (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 2.20-4.46) and other diagnoses (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.30-2.51). Further adjustments for other common symptoms, including mental illness, reduced, but did not abolish these risks. WSP is a major risk factor for disability pensions, and not only pensions for musculoskeletal disorders. The global impact of WSP, and its close association to other symptoms, suggests prevention of the severe occupational outcomes for this group must have a broad focus and move beyond symptom directed approaches.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Dolor/epidemiología , Pensiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Actividades Recreativas , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Musculoesquelético/economía , Dolor Musculoesquelético/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Dolor/economía , Población , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
20.
J R Soc Med ; 104(5): 198-207, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21558098

RESUMEN

Psychiatric disorders are now the most common reason for long-term sickness absence. The associated loss in productivity and the payment of disability benefits places a substantial burden on the economies of many developed countries. The occupational dysfunction associated with psychiatric disorders can also lead to poverty and social isolation. As a result the area of work and psychiatric disorders is a high priority for policymakers. There are two main agendas: for many researchers and clinicians the focus is on the need to overcome stigma and ensure people with severe psychiatric disorders have meaningful work; however the public health agenda predominantly relates to the more common disorders such as depression and anxiety, which contribute a greater burden of disability benefits and pensions. In this review we attempt to address this second agenda. The relatively sparse evidence available reveals a complex field with significant interplay between medical, psychological social and cultural factors. Sick leave can be a 'process' as well as an 'event'. In this review we propose a staged model where different risk and protective factors contribute to the onset of psychiatric disorders in the working population, the onset of short-term sickness absence, and the transition from short- to long-term absence. We also examine strategies to manage psychiatric disorder in the workforce with a view towards returning the employee to work. Our aim in this review is to highlight the complexity of the area, to stimulate debate and to identify important gaps in knowledge where further research might benefit both patients and wider society.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Trabajo , Absentismo , Trastornos de Ansiedad/rehabilitación , Depresión/rehabilitación , Empleo/psicología , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Rehabilitación Vocacional , Jubilación , Medio Social , Estereotipo , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Trabajo/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...